Rapport sur une stratégie de préservation et d’accès aux données scientifiques numériques

Le groupe de travail sur les données numériques (Interagency Working Group on Digital Data- IWGDD) du comité du Conseil national en science et technologie des États-Unis (National Science and Technology Council’s (NSTC) Committee) a publié un rapport détaillant une stratégie pour promouvoir la conservation et l’accès aux données scientifiques numériques.

Texte du message original diffusé sur la liste ERECS-L par Mark Conrad (2009-02-20) :

«The Interagency Working Group on Digital Data (IWGDD) of the National Science and Technology Council’s (NSTC) Committee on Science has issued a report detailing a strategy to promote preservation of, and access to, digital scientific data. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) was one of the agencies that participated in the development of this report. Kenneth Thibodeau and Robert Chadduck of the Electronic Records Archives (ERA) Program Management Office served as NARA’s representatives to this group.»

Le rapport de l’Interagency Working Group on Digital Data (IWGDD) est intitulé :  Harnessing the Power of Digital Data for Science and Society.  Washington, janvier 2009. 

Pour y accéder : http://www.nitrd.gov/about/Harnessing_Power_Web.pdf

Logiciels de gestion des archives : un rapport comparatif

Spiro, Lisa. Archival Management Software: A Report for the Council on Library and Information Resources. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2009.

Table des matières

1. Introduction
2. The Problem of Hidden Collections
3. The Role of Software in Addressing Hidden Collections
4. Research Method8
5. How to Select Archival Management Software
6. Criteria for Choosing Archival Software
7. Types of Software
8. Possible Approaches to Federating Archival Description from Multiple Repositories
9. Conclusion
Works Cited
Appendixes 
Appendix1: The Archival Workflow
Appendix 2: Archival Management Systems Features Matrix [Brief]
Appendix 3: Archival Management Systems Features Matrices [Full]
Appendix 4: Notes from Interviews with Archivists about Archon, Archivists’ Toolkit, Cuadra STAR/Archives, Eloquent, and CollectiveAccess
Archivists’ Toolkit Summary
Reasons for Selecting Archivists’ Toolkit
Ease of Use
Installation and Maintenance
Ease of Customization
User Community
Weaknesses
Strengths
Archon Summary
Reasons for Selecting Archon
Ease of Use
Installation and Maintenance
Ease of Customization
Weaknesses
User Community
Strengths Overall Assessment
Archon’s Response to User Feedback
Cuadra STAR/Archives Summary
Reasons for Selecting Quadra
Installation and Maintenance
Ease of Customization
User Community/Support
Weaknesses
Strengths
Overall Assessment
Eloquent Archive Summary
Reasons for Selecting Eloquent
Ease of Use
Ease of Installation
Ease of Customization
User Community/Support
Weaknesses
Strengths
Eloquent’s Response to User Feedback
CollectiveAccess Summary
Reasons for Selecting CollectiveAccess
Ease of Use
Ease of Customization
Weaknesses
User Community/Support
Strengths

Trouvé via Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog February 4, 2009